If you actually read the SAMDEV document you can pick out quite a few interesting oddities. Firstly the field adjacent to the conservation area in question is not currently within the development boundary as shown left. It seems that in return for a small strip of land to extend the Cemetery the town council has agreed to move the development boundary to include this field.
It seems fairly pointless to define a development boundary if you are going to move it!
I suppose the other question which needs to be looked at is whether its a right and proper way to decide planning applications on the basis of a land swap, Is it even legal? It just adds to the potential conflicts of interest involved in this plan.
The second statement regarding the plan for Ellesmere is bullet pointed:
- The adjacent Mere and the Llangollen branch of the Shropshire Union Canal attract significant numbers of visitors
It seems this has not been deemed significant enough to prevent the proposed development, surely if its been identified as a key attribute of the town we should be protecting it with this plan.
It must be said that of the 730 plots allocated in the SAMDEV it seems pointless to risk the most significant attribute of the town for a mere 22 houses. There is currently planning permission for nearly 400 houses on a brownfield site across town which is only just underway and will provide ample housing for some time to come and most of the other areas identified are perfectly sensible options. I would question the wisdom of the developments in the blue areas though, why build in places which you know are prone to flooding.